Author: imkava

Seminar January 20 with Mane Tsaturyan: “Armenia’s Foreign Policy Options…”

  By , ,

Mane Tsaturyan: “Armenia’s Foreign Policy Options Within China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Small State Perspective” 

Place & Time

Date: 20 January, 15:15-17:00 

Place: NI:C0933 seminar room, 9th floor, Niagara, Nordenskiöldsgatan 1

Or Online: https://mau-se.zoom.us/j/68831376873, Meeting ID: 688 3137 6873

Bio

Mane Tsaturyan is an International Relations specialist currently working at the Delegation of the European Union to Armenia, where she prepares briefings, assessments, and detailed political reports on developments in Armenia and the wider region. She holds a Master’s degree in European Interdisciplinary Studies from the College of Europe in Natolin, where she was awarded the United Nations Award for the Best Thesis on “Europe, Multilateralism, and the UN.” She also holds a Master’s degree in World Politics from Yerevan State University, and is an alumna of the Diplomatic Academy of the MFA of Armenia. Her areas of expertise include EU foreign policy, multilateralism, the UN, the migration–foreign policy nexus, security, China, and Armenia.

Abstract

How does a small state like Armenia navigate one of the world’s largest infrastructure and economic projects, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)? In this talk, I will present my research exploring Armenia’s foreign policy choices within the BRI framework, especially after the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War. Using small state theory, we will look at the unique challenges and opportunities Armenia faces in balancing security concerns with the desire for economic integration. I will highlight why, despite the BRI being over a decade old, Armenia remains largely outside its main corridors, and what this reveals about the delicate strategies small states use to engage with global mega-initiatives.

Welcome to RUCARR seminar 20th January!

New anthology – Languages in Conflict and War. Ukraine, the Caucasus, and the Baltics

  By

New publication is out: “Languages in Conflict and War. Ukraine, the Caucasus, and the Baltics”, available as ebook.

Publisher’s webpage: 

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-032-08419-4…

Book series:

Palgrave Studies of Languages at War.

Editorial team: 

Karina Vamling, Nadiya Kiss, Bo Petersson, Liudmyla Pidkuimukha.

Table of contents and contributors:

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-032-08419-4#toc

1     Introduction: Languages in Conflict and War. Karina Vamling, Nadiya Kiss, Bo Petersson, Liudmyla Pidkuimukha
2     Language and Identity Erasure: Russia’s Strategy in the Occupied Regions of Ukraine. Liudmyla Pidkuimukha
3     Language Shift, Displacement, and Abrogation: Narratives of the Ukrainian Writers in Times of War. Nadiya Kiss
4     Depopulation of the Hungarian National Minority in Transcarpathia as One of the Consequences of Russia’s War against Ukraine. Halyna Shumytska and Fedir Shandor
5     The Sororization Effect in Interviews with Refugees: Negotiation of Positionality, Shared Knowledge, and Emotions. Lesya Skintey and Dariia Orobchuk
6     Linguistic Sovereignty and Vernacular Biopolitics: Estonian Russophones as a Postcolonial Phenomenon. Andrey Makarychev
7     Between Hopes and Anxiety: A Critical Analysis of Discourses Surrounding Latvian Russian-Speaking Youth during the Russo-Ukrainian War. Lena Hercberga
8     Surviving Suppression: Circassian Language Preservation in Russia and the Diaspora. Lidia Zhigunova
9     “It all starts in the family”: Placing Discourses on the Role of Families in Circassian Language Preservation into a Historical-Political Context. Valeriya Minakova
10   The Future of the Indigenous Circassian Language amid Increased Russification of the Kuban Region and the Russian War in Ukraine. Lars Funch Hansen
11   Official Language Ecology in Contemporary Georgia. Mariam Manjgaladze 
12   Functions of the Russian Language in Modern Georgia. Tinatin Bolkvadze
13   The Linguistic Landscape of Georgia—Diachronic and Synchronic Approaches. Maka Tetradze 
14   Conclusions. Karina Vamling, Nadiya Kiss, Bo Petersson, Liudmyla Pidkuimukha

RUCARR seminar Dec 9 with Håvard Swane Bækken

  By ,

Prof. Håvard Swane Bækken: “Militarized Patriotism and Identity Policy in the Occupied Donbas”

Time: 9 December, 15:15-17:00
Place: NI:C0933 seminar room, 9th floor, Niagara, Nordenskiöldsgatan 1

Online: https://mau-se.zoom.us/j/63790169816
Meeting ID: 637 9016 9816

Bio

Håvard Bækken is Professor of Russian Area Studies and has been affiliated with the Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies (IFS) since 2015. As of 2025, he is also affiliated with the School of Intelligence and Language (SESK) 

Bækken’s research focus at IFS is militarism and military patriotic education in Russia and in occupied parts of Ukraine. Bækken is heading the research project Contested Ukraine: Military Patriotism, Russian Influence, and Implications for European Security, and (temporary) the Research Programme for Ukraine and Full-Spectrum Threats. 

Bækken teaches extensively and is responsible for courses on Russian politics and society as well as on Russian history and its uses. His previous research includes several publications on quasi-legal practices in Russia.

Abstract

Since the first invasion of Ukrainian territories in 2014, Russia has been using militarized patriotic education to further its strategic aims in the occupied regions. In his presentation, Håvard Bækken will introduce his research on military patriotic education in Russia, and in particular his articles on the export of militarized patriotism into occupied Ukraine. At the core of the presentation will be the policy employed in the so-called peoples republics in the Donbas before the full-scale invasion, where the changing faces of patriotic education is seen as a reflection of strategic concerns in Moscow. Since 2019, Bækken argues, the pace and direction changed, as clubs (esp. Yunarmiya) has become more directly involved in Russia’s plan of cultural assimilation of the youth. Today, Yunarmiya is actively promoting Russian nationhood in every occupied oblast of Ukraine. 

Welcome!

Seminar June 3: Parliamentary Buildings as Contested Spaces in Georgia and Ukraine: Power, Protest, and Legitimacy from the Soviet Era to Post-Independence

  By , ,

Parliamentary Buildings as Contested Spaces in Georgia and Ukraine: Power, Protest, and Legitimacy from the Soviet Era to Post-Independence

 RUCARR seminar with Lika Kobeshavidze

Lika Kobeshavidze is a Georgian political writer and analytical journalist specialising in EU policy and regional security in Europe. She is currently based in Lund, Sweden, pursuing advanced studies in European Studies.

Time: 3 June, 15:15-17:00
Place: Seminar room 9th floor, Niagara or online https://mau-se.zoom.us/j/62245882436

 Abstract:

This thesis explores the changing symbolic meanings of parliamentary buildings in Georgia and Ukraine. It focuses on how these spaces evolved from symbols of Soviet authority to main sites of resistance and political struggle through protest movements. The study offers a comparative analysis of Georgia and Ukraine through six key events that illustrate the symbolic transformation of the parliament buildings: the Georgian language protests and the Helsinki Group movement during the late Soviet era (1978–1988), the independence movements of 1989–1991 in both countries; the Rose Revolution in Georgia (2003), and the Orange Revolution in Ukraine (2004). The thesis uses Most Similar Systems Design (MSSD) to compare Ukraine and Georgia, two countries that share a common Soviet past and similar experiences with mass protests, although the state response and course of the events differ in detail. The analysis focuses on Henri Lefebvre’s idea of space as socially produced and Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic power, combined with discourse analysis methods by Norman Fairclough and Teun van Dijk. These theoretical frameworks allow a detailed analysis of how the discourse of the population, the language of protest, and the collective perception influence the change in the symbolic meaning of these spaces. By focusing on both the discursive and physical aspects of protests, the thesis emphasizes that these buildings are more than administrative centers and that during specific events, they change their symbolic meaning through the discourse and actions of the protesters. 

 

RUCARR seminar “Resilient Voices: Women Educators in Conflict Zones and Their Role in Rebuilding Societies” with Iryna Halasa, May 27

  By ,

Resilient Voices: Women Educators in Conflict Zones and Their Role in Rebuilding Societies

Dr Iryna Halasa, Associate Professor at West Ukrainian National University and British Academy Fellow and visiting scholar at King’s College London

Time: 27th May, 15:15-17:00
Place: Seminar room 9th floor, Niagara or online https://mau-se.zoom.us/j/64991963211

 

Bio

Iryna Halasa is an Associate Professor at West Ukrainian National University. She is currently a British Academy Fellow and visiting scholar at King’s College London, where she is working on her project “Researcher in Conflict: Maintaining Neutrality Amid Personal and National Crisis”. Her research examines how war impacts academic positionality, neutrality, and voice, particularly in the fields of linguistics and communication studies. Dr Halasa earned her PhD in Philology from Ivan Franko National University of L’viv in 2011. She is also leading the project “Resilient Voices: Women Educators in Conflict Zones and Their Role in Rebuilding Societies”, which explores the experiences of female educators in war-affected regions, focusing on education, gender, sociolinguistics, and post-conflict reconstruction. She is the author of the 2025 book Making War Visible: Language as a Weapon During Russia’s Full-Scale Invasion of Ukraine, which analyzes how language is used strategically in wartime discourse. Her academic experience is supported by numerous international fellowships and internships in the USA, the UK, Sweden, Hungary, Poland, and other countries.

Abstract

Education is a fundamental pillar of societal resilience and recovery, particularly in conflict-affected regions where the destruction of infrastructure, forced displacement, and psychological trauma disrupt learning. In these crises, women educators play a crucial yet often unrecognized role in maintaining access to education, fostering community stability, and shaping the post-conflict reconstruction process. Our project seeks to explore and document the contributions of Ukrainian female teachers during the full-scale invasion by Russia, highlighting their resilience, challenges, and impact on rebuilding societies through education. The problem our research addresses is the position of Ukrainian women educators and their vital role in sustaining education, supporting students, and fostering societal resilience amid military, economic, and personal crises. Armed conflicts affect education systems, leaving teachers – especially women – to navigate extreme challenges such as displacement, trauma, lack of resources, and threats to personal and family safety, all while maintaining their professional and caregiving responsibilities

 This project aims to uncover how female teachers navigate the immense challenges of teaching in Ukraine during wartime, shedding light on the strategies they employ to sustain education and provide stability in times of upheaval. By examining their approaches – both formal and informal – we seek to understand how they adapt curricula, foster resilience, and offer crucial emotional support to students facing war trauma. Beyond immediate survival, the project explores how women’s dedication lays the groundwork for healing future generations and shapes post-war societies through education and mentorship.

Russia Reverts to Muscovy: What if We Drop “Russia” from the Discourse? – RUCARR seminar with Prof. Stefan Hedlund

  By ,

Stefan Hedlund: “Russia Reverts to Muscovy: What if We Drop “Russia” from the Discourse?”

Time: 18th March, 15.15 – 17.00

Place: NI:C0315 or online: https://mau-se.zoom.us/j/66754621955

Abstract

The presentation expands on three of the main themes of the book Russia Reverts to Muscovy: What if We drop “Russia” from the Discourse?, all of which converge in an argument that we should stop talking about “Russia” and revert to the old name for northeastern Rus, which is “Muscovy.” The first is that so much of the territory of the former Russian Empire has now been lost that it is only logical to refer to the remnants as Muscovy. The second is that the present-day Russian Federation has reverted almost fully to the institutional order that marked old Muscovy, thus adding to the relevance of using that name, and the third is that continued use of the name “Russia” implies acceptance of the Muscovite claim to a sphere of interest that includes Ukraine.

If the present-day Muscovites want to call themselves “Russians” then that is of course their prerogative, much as others have a right to refer to themselves as Ukrainians or Belarusians. Where it goes unacceptably wrong is when it is claimed that all Eastern Slavs are “Russians,” and that those “Russians” must not only accept this distinction but also submit to being ruled from Moscow.

Stefan Hedlund is Professor Emeritus of Soviet and East European Studies at IRES, Uppsala University. He has published more than two dozen books, mainly but not exclusively on themes relating to Russian developments, and he has published more than a hundred articles on similar themes, in various forms and shapes. His works have been published in Russian and Chinese, and he has been a frequent commentator in various media across a number of countries. His most recent book, Russia Reverts to Muscovy: What if We drop “Russia” from the Discourse? (Routledge, 2025), is the latest instalment in a series of books on institutional developments in Russia and Ukraine, the previous volume being Ukraine, Russia and The West: When Value Promotion met Hard Power (Routledge, 2023).

 

Seminar with Leila Wilmers – Interpreting the Discourse of a Multi-Ethnic Russian Nation in Kazan, May 6

  By ,

Diversity or Unity: Interpreting the Discourse of a Multi-Ethnic Russian Nation in Kazan

Dr. Leila Wilmers is a Regional Scholar at Cornell University’s Einaudi Center for International Studies and teaches in Cornell’s Department of Sociology. She has a background in peacebuilding work in the non-profit sector and holds a PhD in human geography from Loughborough University, UK. Her research concerns nationalism in the contemporary world, and particularly experiences of nationhood and the processes and conditions of bottom-up engagement with nationalist ideology and politics. Her research and teaching crosses the disciplines of sociology and human geography and her regional expertise is in the post-Soviet space. Her work has been published in the journals Europe-Asia Studies, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Nationalities Papers, and Ethnicities.

Time: 6th May, 15:15 – 17:00 (rescheduled from February 18)

Place: Seminar room 9th floor, Niagara or online: https://mau-se.zoom.us/j/64838117167

 Abstract

This talk explores bottom-up responses to the Kremlin’s approach to nation-building in a multi-ethnic state. How do residents of ethnically mixed cities navigate conflicting themes of unity and diversity in the federal discourse of Russia as a multi-ethnic nation (mnogonatsional’nyi narod)? This discourse runs counter to assimilative policies and a concurrent vision of Russia as a civilisation rooted in Slavic culture. In the diverse city of Kazan, the discourse is shown to be easily adopted by residents in narrating belonging, while being a problematic basis for nation-building. The talk highlights the importance of regional and ethnic subject positions in bottom-up engagement with nation-building in Russia.

Welcome!

RUCARR seminar with Esma Berikshvili – The Affect of Lost Infrastructure and Informal Economic Practices in the Port City of Poti, Georgia

  By ,

The City of Eternal Promises – The Affect of Lost Infrastructure and Informal Economic Practices in the Port City of Poti, Georgia

Esma Berikishvili, a visiting PhD student from Ilia State University, will give a seminar titled: “The City of Eternal Promises – The Affect of Lost Infrastructure and Informal Economic Practices in the Port City of Poti, Georgia”. This talk will explore the impact of post-Rose Revolution reforms on Poti, a Georgian port city, through an ethnographic and anthropological lens and critically examine the socio-economic and political transformations following the 2003 neoliberal reforms, including the privatization of Poti’s port and the establishment of a Free Industrial Zone (FIZ). These state-led modernization efforts, aimed at fostering economic growth, fell short of their promises, leading to failed investments, economic decline, and precarious livelihoods. The seminar will highlight how Poti’s residents adapt to these changes through informal maritime economic practices like fishing, fish-smoking, and scrap metal collection, revealing resilience and ingenuity amid structural challenges.

When: December,3, 15.15 – 17.00

 Where: Seminar room, 9th floor, Niagara, Nordenskiöldsgatan 1
Zoom: https://mau-se.zoom.us/j/66778170406, Meeting ID: 667 7817 0406

RUCARR seminars with Prof. Oliver Reisner – November 12 and 26

  By , ,

Prof. Oliver Reisner, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, visiting researcher at RUCARR, will give two seminars. Welcome to join us on campus or Zoom:

Social Cohesion and Political Developments in Georgia in Times of Democratic Backsliding and Growing Authoritarianism

When: November 12, 15.00 – 17.00
Hybrid seminar: Seminar room, 9th  floor, Niagara, Nordenskiöldsgatan 1
Or Zoom: https://mau-se.zoom.us/j/68228687099, Meeting ID: 682 2868 7099

Golden or Pink – Stalin as an Embattled Memory Site, or How to Cope with a Traumatic Past in Post-Soviet Georgia

When: November 26, 15.00 – 17.00
Hybrid seminar:Seminar room, 9th  floor, Niagara, Nordenskiöldsgatan 1
Or Zoom: https://mau-se.zoom.us/j/69679035449 Meeting ID: 696 7903 5449

 Short Bio

Since September 2016 Oliver Reisner works as Jean Monnet Professor in European & Caucasian Studies at Ilia State University and teaches courses for BA, MA and PhD students with majors in “European Studies” and “Caucasian Studies.” In 2000 he graduated with a Dr. phil. in Eastern European History, Slavic Studies and Medieval and Modern History from Georg August University Goettingen (Germany). 2000 – 2003 he prepared and coordinated a MA program “Central Asia/Caucasus” at the Department for Central Asian Studies at Humboldt University in Berlin. 2003 – 2005 as a human rights program manager for World Vision Georgia he implemented a civic integration project in Samtskhe-Javakheti and Kvemo Kartli regions of Georgia. 2005 – 2015 as project manager at the EU Delegation to Georgia he dealt with democratisation, minority, education, youth, labour and social affairs. In 25 years of research on Russian, Georgian, Caucasian history and contemporary affairs in theory and practice he covered topics of 1) Nation-building and identity in the Caucasus during the 19th and 20th centuries; 2) Memory studies on dealing with the Soviet past in Georgia and the Caucasus; 3) History of Caucasian Studies as area studies and 4) the role of religion in Georgia.

 

 

RUCARR Thesis Award 2024 awarded to Johan Richter

  By ,

The RUCARR Thesis Award 2024 has been awarded to Johan Richter for his MA thesis entitled “Milbloggers, Telegram, and the Russo-Ukraine War: The Role of Non-State Actors in Shaping Strategic Narratives during Global Conflict”- 

The Thesis Award was presented to Johan Richter by Prof. Mona Lilja, Head of Department, Global Political Studies, on October 22, 2024.

Excerpts from the statement by the jury:

Johan Richter’s thesis is an innovative study of Russian military bloggers  

and their role in influencing and amplifying the Russian regime’s discourse on the war in Ukraine.  The research design is elegant and sophisticated without being over-complicated. The amount of data he has used for this thesis, and the manner in which he handles the analysis and keeps the reader’s interest is impressive.

This is a thesis that contains high-quality original research and uses a systematic research framework. It is innovative and points the way forward to new possible lines of research in the study of authoritarian information spheres.